Qs Learning Stories - April 30 Lessons Learned

Posted on April 30, 2008 
Filed under CourseDesign, Events, LearningStories

Our last Learning Stories Luncheon with 2007 CDI Fellows has come and gone. Over 40 faculty and staff attended and we got to most of their questions except the following two for Adisa:

He talked about students’ dislike of the online essay (vs. attending class) assignment and a question was raised:

Comments



4 Responses to “Qs Learning Stories - April 30 Lessons Learned”

  1.  Kurt Lindemann on April 30th, 2008 4:01 pm

    Although my students weren’t required to do online essays, I think the question about flexibility relates to another point made in the ftf discussion about students’ recreational use of technology applications like facebook.

    Although students will obviously need to learn to formulate thoughts and ideas, and express those ideas in well-constructed arguments, it may be that their often-used mode of expression is not a traditional essay. Again, students certainly need to learn the thinking and writing skills associated with such essays, but I’m wondering about other formats students in which students might express such thinking: blogs? wikis? websites? I’m not sure.

    I know this is a bit to the side of the question asked and Adisa’s assignment, but the question just prompted me to think a bit more about non-traditional writing formats.

  2.  Suzanne on May 1st, 2008 8:33 am

    Yes there may be something in the juxtaposition of everyday forms of writing in virtuality and a “traditional” essay question assignment.

    I think most faculty are concerned about students’ overall writing competencies while some are looking for modalities to extend what it means to be competent.

    There are so many choices, each with its particular register, style and emerging nuances.

    The blogosphere is where I get the majority of my professionally related information. Blogging has become a legitimate journalistic medium. I also read blogs where the author is working out concepts that will likely become a paper, and others who are stating a position, which quickly becomes an exchange of positions when commenting happens.

    Wikis are quite different. At their base, they’re about collaboration and collaborative authorship. In a teaching setting both have extraordinary potential for peer exchange and feedback around writing

    Peer feedback will be one of the themes of the CDI 2008 from May 27-30. How do we harness the power of the social web (Web 2.0) in ways that benefit the teaching and learning process? Perhaps it’s by shifting some of the responsibility of providing feedback over to students.

  3.  Val Renegar on May 1st, 2008 2:03 pm

    I’m dwelling on what Kurt mentioned about non-traditional writing assignments. I have a lot of sympathy for Adisa when says that his students hate the essays. Because students hate essays. Writing is hard! If the on-line part is juts a delivery method, then it makes sense that the don’t like doing it on-line any better than they like doing in a traditional format. It woudl be interesting to think about other ways to write and reflect- depending on what the learning outcome goal might be. I was just thinking about this woman in Japan who writes novels on her cell phone. There are other ways of thinking and writing that may be better able to actively include technology (hyperlinks, etc.) rather than just using it as a delivery vehicle.

  4.  Suzanne Aurilio on May 2nd, 2008 8:59 am

    Hear Hear…New literacies are developing before our eyes, it’s a matter of the lens we use to see and understand them.

Leave a Reply




*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image